000			03100nam a2200373 4500
001			OTLid0000106
003			MnU
005			20201105133258.0
006			m o d s
008			180907s2014 mnu o 0 0 eng d
020			_a
040			_aMnU _beng _cMnU
050		4	_aKF385.A4
050		4	_aK7200
100	1		_aTurner, Christian _eauthor
245	0	0	_aLand Use _cChristian Turner
264		2	_bOpen Textbook Library
264		1	_bCALI's eLangdell® Press
300			_a1 online resource
490	0		_aOpen textbook library.
505	0		_a1. Preface2. The Zoning System -- 2.1. Introduction -- 2.2. Variances -- 2.3. Special Use Permits -- 2.4. Comprehensive Planning -- 3. Judicial Review -- 3.1. Substantive Due Process -- 3.2. Adjudication and Quasi-Adjudication -- 3.3. Procedure -- 3.4. Discriminatory Zoning -- 3.5. Anticompetitive Zoning -- 3.6. Spot Zoning -- 3.7. Contract Zoning -- 3.8. Nonconforming Uses -- 3.9. Vested Rights -- 3.10. Neighbor Consent Provisions -- 4. Regulatory Takings -- 4.1. Origins -- 4.2. Theory -- 4.3. Doctrine -- 4.4. Procedural Issues -- 4.5. Exactions -- 4.6. German Takings Law
520	0		_aThis text explores the laws governing the use of land. Sometimes narrowly focused, often intensely local, land use regulation may give the impression of a highly specialized field with small stakes. The text is divided into three parts: First, we will survey the ordinary, local administrative scheme of land use regulation. The cases in this section are intended to establish what that system is and what it's standards are. In the second part of the course, we will turn our attention to cases illustrating litigation attacks on the ordinary administrative scheme. The purpose here is not, as it was in the first part, to understand better the standards the administrators should apply, but to understand the constraints imposed on the contents of local laws, the procedures of enactment and permitting, and the composition of local lawmaking bodies. In the third part, we focus on the distributive concerns raised by land use regulation. The regulatory takings doctrine has gone from, literally, nothing, to wrestling to disentangle distributive concerns from substantive ones, to trying to craft either rules or standards to identify regulations that go "too far" and should be considered "takings" within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment. We will consider what the doctrine's purposes are, how it should be governed, and how it should be invoked as a procedural matter.
542	1		_fAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
546			_aIn English.
588	0		_aDescription based on print resource
650		0	_aLaw _vTextbooks _zUnited States
650		0	_aProperty Law _vTextbooks
710	2		_aOpen Textbook Library _edistributor
856	4	0	_uhttps://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/106 _zAccess online version
999			_c19537 _d19537