| 000 | 03287cam a22005294a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | muse53855 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20210127151116.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 160518r20162015sa o 00 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9781928331155 | ||
| 020 | _a1928331157 | ||
| 020 | _z9781928331148 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)950196046 | ||
| 040 |
_aMdBmJHUP _cMdBmJHUP |
||
| 043 | _afe----- | ||
| 050 | 4 |
_aJQ2945.A56 _bC643 2015 |
|
| 082 | 0 |
_a353.4/628809676 _223 |
|
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aEffectiveness of Anti-Corruption Agencies in East Africa: Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda _ca review by AfriMAP. |
| 264 | 1 | _bProject Muse, | |
| 264 | 3 | _bProject MUSE, | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (ix, 106 pages) | ||
| 500 | _a"December 2015." | ||
| 500 | _aIssued as part of book collections on Project MUSE. | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
| 506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access _fUnrestricted online access _2star |
|
| 520 | _aWith reportedly over USD50 billion lost annually through graft and illicit practices, combating corruption in Africa has been challenging. However, laws and policies at the continental, regional and national levels have been promulgated and enacted by African leaders. These initiatives have included the establishment of anti-corruption agencies mandated to tackle graft at national level, as well as coordinate bodies at regional and continental levels to ensure the harmonisation of normative standards and the adoption of best practices in the fight against corruption. Yet, given the disparity between the apparent impunity enjoyed by public servants and the anti-corruption rhetoric of governments in the region, the effectiveness of these agencies is viewed with scepticism. This continent-wide study of anti-corruption agencies aims to gauge their relevance and effectiveness by assessing their independence, mandate, available resources, national ownership, capacities and strategic positioning. These surveys include evidence-based recommendations calling for stronger, more relevant and effective institutions that are directly aligned to regional and continental anti-corruption frameworks, such as the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption (AUCPCC), which the three countries in this current report - Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda - have all ratified. | ||
| 588 | _aDescription based on print version record. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aIndependent regulatory commissions _zAfrica, East _xEvaluation. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aPolitical corruption _zAfrica, East _xPrevention. |
|
| 655 | 0 | _aElectronic books. | |
| 655 | 7 |
_aElectronic books. _2local |
|
| 710 | 2 |
_aAfriMAP, _eissuing body. |
|
| 710 | 2 |
_aProject Muse, _edistributor. |
|
| 776 | 1 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _z9781928331148 |
| 710 | 2 |
_aProject Muse. _edistributor |
|
| 830 | 0 | _aBook collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_zFull text available: _uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/book/45597/ |
| 945 | _aProject MUSE - 2016 Political Science and Policy Studies | ||
| 945 | _aProject MUSE - 2016 African Studies | ||
| 945 | _aProject MUSE - 2016 Complete | ||
| 999 |
_c24642 _d24642 |
||