| 000 | 03462cam a22004694a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | muse77201 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20210127151300.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 111108t20191966mdu o 00 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9781421429946 | ||
| 020 | _z9781421430768 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1110908379 | ||
| 040 |
_aMdBmJHUP _cMdBmJHUP |
||
| 050 | 0 | 4 |
_aPR4803.H44 _bZ58 |
| 082 | 0 | _a828.809 | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBender, Todd K. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aGerard Manley Hopkins _bThe Classical Background and Critical Reception of His Work / _cby Todd K. Bender. |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (1 online resource ix, 172 pages) | ||
| 500 | _aThe text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aThe critical response to the first and second editions of the poems -- The publication of the prose and a note on the unpublished notebooks -- The non-logical structure of "the wreck of the Deutschland": Hopkins and Pindar -- Non-logical syntax: Latin and Greek hyperbaton -- Metaphysical imagery and explosive meaning: Crashow, Hopkins, and Martial. | |
| 506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access _fUnrestricted online access _2star |
|
| 520 | _aIn his lifetime, Gerard Manley Hopkins was known as a poet only by a small circle of his friends. More than any other major Victorian writer, he was recovered and presented as a poet to modern readers by editors and scholars of the first half of the twentieth century. This book analyzes how and to what extent the presuppositions of these critics have dictated the modern conception of Hopkins's work. Bender seeks to dispel, once and for all, the notion that Hopkins was a naïf poet. He provides an analysis of classical Greek and Latin rhetoric relative to the classical background of Hopkins's style and the structure in his poetry. He maintains that especially in Hopkins's more extreme work, such as "The Wreck of the Deutschland," there are precedents for the structure of the poem itself, the structure of the sentences within the poem, and its sensual and obscure imagery in the classical literature that Hopkins knew so well. Bender's study suggests two highly controversial positons: first, that although Hopkins is one of the most original voices in English, his poetry is within a tradition insufficiently recognized by modern critics; and second, that the effect of careful and sympathetic study of classical literature can induce quite the opposite of a neoclassical style in English. | ||
| 588 | _aDescription based on print version record. | ||
| 600 | 1 | 1 |
_aHopkins, Gerard Manley, _d1844-1889 _xKnowledge and learning. |
| 600 | 1 | 1 |
_aHopkins, Gerard Manley, _d1844-1889 _xCriticism and interpretation _xHistory. |
| 650 | 0 |
_aEnglish poetry _xClassical influences. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCatholics _zEngland _xIntellectual life. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aClassicism _zEngland _xHistory _y19th century. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aChristian poetry, English _y19th century _xHistory and criticism. |
|
| 655 | 0 |
_aElectronic books. _2local |
|
| 655 | 7 |
_aElectronic books. _2local |
|
| 710 | 2 | _aProject Muse. | |
| 710 | 2 |
_aProject Muse. _edistributor |
|
| 830 | 0 | _aBook collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_zFull text available: _uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/book/67088/ |
| 999 |
_c25275 _d25275 |
||