| 000 | 03037cam a22005054a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | muse76576 | ||
| 003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
| 005 | 20210127151338.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
| 008 | 190816r20192018ne o 00 0 en dd | ||
| 020 | _a9789048537143 | ||
| 020 | _a9048537142 | ||
| 020 | _z9789462985902 | ||
| 020 | _z9462985901 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)1112364090 | ||
| 040 |
_aMdBmJHUP _cMdBmJHUP |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aK212 _b.A533 2018 |
|
| 082 | 0 |
_a340/.1 _223 |
|
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aAnalogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse _cedited by Hendrik Kaptein and Bastiaan van der Velden. |
| 264 | 1 | _bProject Muse, | |
| 264 | 3 | _bProject MUSE, | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (195 pages) | ||
| 500 | _aIssued as part of book collections on Project MUSE. | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 177-187) and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- Imitation and analogy / Amalia Amaya -- Indefeasible analogical argument / Scott Brewer -- Is analogy a form of legal reasoning? / Bartosz Brożek -- Analogical reasoning and extensive interpretation / Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet -- Analogy and balancing : the partial reducibility thesis and its problems / David Duarte -- Analogy and balancing : a reply to David Duarte / Bartosz Brożek -- Analogy and balancing once again : a reply to Bartosz Brożek / David Duarte -- Argument by analogy in the law / Martin Golding -- Undoing damage by analogy : as if (almost) nothing happened, with notes on the meaning of everything / Hendrik Kaptein -- Analogy in the strict liability rules in the Dutch civil code / Bastiaan van der Velden. | |
| 506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access _fUnrestricted online access _2star |
|
| 520 | _aThis book brings together contributions from leading figures in legal studies on analogy and related forms of reasoning in the law. Analogical reasoning-which relies on the concept of two different things being in some way like each other-is hugely important not just in the practice of law, but it is nonetheless strongly contested. This volume raises key questions like: What is the logical, argumentative, rhetorical, or just heuristic force of analogy in law? Is analogy really different from extensive interpretation, reasoning by precedent and appeal to paradigm? | ||
| 588 | _aDescription based on print version record. | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aAnalogy. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aLaw _xMethodology. |
|
| 655 | 0 | _aElectronic books. | |
| 655 | 7 |
_aElectronic books. _2local |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aVelden, Bastiaan D. van der, _eeditor. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aKaptein, Hendrik, _eeditor. |
|
| 710 | 2 |
_aProject Muse _edistributor. |
|
| 776 | 1 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _z9789462985902 _z9462985901 |
| 710 | 2 |
_aProject Muse. _edistributor |
|
| 830 | 0 | _aBook collections on Project MUSE. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_zFull text available: _uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/book/66373/ |
| 999 |
_c25474 _d25474 |
||