000			02309nam a22003737a 4500
001			103602
003			KnowledgeUnlatched
005			20210303104821.0
006			m o d
007			cr u||||||||||
008			210129p20182019gw o u00| u eng d
037			_5BiblioBoard
245	0	4	_aThe lexeme in descriptive and theoretical morphology _cGeorgette Dal, Oliver Bonami, Gilles Boyé.
020			_a9783961101108
029	1		_ahttps://library.biblioboard.com/ext/api/media/0ea1d47f-c80b-44dc-a19f-b2ae4b4f18d0/assets/thumbnail.jpg
040			_aScCtBLL _cScCtBLL
506	0		_aAccess copy available to the general public. _fUnrestricted _2star
700	1		_aDal, Georgette _eeditor.
700	1		_aBonami, Oliver _eauthor.
700	1		_aBoyé, Gilles _eeditor.
264		1	_bLanguage Science Press,
300			_a1 online resource (567 p.)
520			_aAfter being dominant during about a century since its invention by Baudouin de Courtenay at the end of the nineteenth century, morpheme is more and more replaced by lexeme in contemporary descriptive and theoretical morphology. The notion of a lexeme is usually associated with the work of P. H. Matthews (1972, 1974), who characterizes it as a lexical entity abstracting over individual inflected words. Over the last three decades, the lexeme has become a cornerstone of much work in both inflectional morphology and word formation (or, as it is increasingly been called, lexeme formation). The papers in the present volume take stock of the descriptive and theoretical usefulness of the lexeme, but also adress many of the challenges met by classical lexeme-based theories of morphology.
588	0		_aDescription based on print version record.
590			_aLanguage Science Press 2018-2020
650		7	_aLanguage Arts & Disciplines / Linguistics _2bisacsh
650		0	_aLanguage arts
655		0	_aElectronic books.
758			_iIs found in: _aKnowledge Unlatched _1https://openresearchlibrary.org/module/2774bc74-146a-484f-a7ba-ab1d6a09bbfb
856	4	0	_uhttps://openresearchlibrary.org/content/0ea1d47f-c80b-44dc-a19f-b2ae4b4f18d0 _zView this content on Open Research Library. _70
999			_c32719 _d32719