000			03697nam a22003857a 4500
001			105994
003			KnowledgeUnlatched
005			20210303104853.0
006			m o d
007			cr u||||||||||
008			210129p20202020xx o u00| u eng d
037			_5BiblioBoard
245	0	0	_aSemantic differences in translation _bExploring the field of inchoativity / _cLore Vandevoorde.
020			_a9783961100736
024	8		_ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2573677
029	1		_ahttps://library.biblioboard.com/ext/api/media/30ec8384-0fea-4844-a31d-b96e9d565e2e/assets/thumbnail.jpg
040			_aScCtBLL _cScCtBLL
100	1		_aVandevoorde, Lore _eauthor.
264		1	_bLanguage Science Press,
300			_a1 online resource (1 p.)
490	1		_aTranslation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing
506	0		_aAccess copy available to the general public. _fUnrestricted _2star
520			_aAlthough the notion of meaning has always been at the core of translation, the invariance of meaning has, partly due to practical constraints, rarely been challenged in Corpus-based Translation Studies. In answer to this, the aim of this book is to question the invariance of meaning in translated texts: if translation scholars agree on the fact that translated language is different from non-translated language with respect to a number of grammatical and lexical aspects, would it be possible to identify differences between translated and non-translated language on the semantic level too? More specifically, this books tries to formulate an answer to the following three questions: (i) how can semantic differences in translated vs non-translated language be investigated in a corpus-based study?, (ii) are there any differences on the semantic level between translated and non-translated language? and (iii) if there are differences on the semantic level, can we ascribe them to any of the (universal) tendencies of translation? In this book, I establish a way to visually explore semantic similarity on the basis of representations of translated and non-translated semantic fields. A technique for the comparison of semantic fields of translated and non-translated language called SMM++ (based on Helge Dyvik's Semantic Mirrors method) is developed, yielding statistics-based visualizations of semantic fields. The SMM++ is presented via the case of inchoativity in Dutch (beginnen [to begin]). By comparing the visualizations of the semantic fields on different levels (translated Dutch with French as a source language, with English as a source language and non-translated Dutch) I further explore whether the differences between translated and non-translated fields of inchoativity in Dutch can be linked to any of the well-known universals of translation. The main results of this study are explained on the basis of two cognitively inspired frameworks: Halverson's Gravitational Pull Hypothesis and Paradis' neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism.
588	0		_aDescription based on print version record.
590			_aLanguage Science Press 2018-2020
650		7	_aLanguage Arts & Disciplines / Linguistics _2bisacsh
650		0	_aLanguage arts
655		0	_aElectronic books.
758			_iIs found in: _aKnowledge Unlatched _1https://openresearchlibrary.org/module/2774bc74-146a-484f-a7ba-ab1d6a09bbfb
830	0		_aTranslation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing
856	4	0	_uhttps://openresearchlibrary.org/content/30ec8384-0fea-4844-a31d-b96e9d565e2e _zView this content on Open Research Library. _70
999			_c32796 _d32796