| 000 | 01914nam a22003497a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 101762 | ||
| 003 | KnowledgeUnlatched | ||
| 005 | 20210303105041.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr u|||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 210129p20172019xx o u00| u ger d | ||
| 037 | _5BiblioBoard | ||
| 245 | 0 | 4 |
_aDer Abschreckungseffekt auf die Grundrechtsausübung _bStrukturen eines verfassungsrechtlichen Arguments / _cJulian Staben. |
| 020 | _a9783161554889 | ||
| 029 | 1 | _ahttps://library.biblioboard.com/ext/api/media/ee2f0892-290d-4b38-a5ee-3602735594f4/assets/thumbnail.jpg | |
| 040 |
_aScCtBLL _cScCtBLL |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aStaben, Julian _eauthor. |
|
| 264 | 1 | _bMohr Siebeck, | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (221 p.) | ||
| 506 | 0 |
_aAccess copy available to the general public. _fUnrestricted _2star |
|
| 520 | _aJulian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes to online behaviour and emerging digital practices and therefore call for their constitutional reassessment. Julian Staben's work enables a more methodologically reflective use of these arguments in the judicial discourse. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aDescription based on print version record. | |
| 590 | _aKU Open Services | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_aLaw _2bisacsh |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aLaw | |
| 655 | 0 | _aElectronic books. | |
| 758 |
_iIs found in: _aKnowledge Unlatched _1https://openresearchlibrary.org/module/2774bc74-146a-484f-a7ba-ab1d6a09bbfb |
||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://openresearchlibrary.org/content/ee2f0892-290d-4b38-a5ee-3602735594f4 _zView this content on Open Research Library. _70 |
| 999 |
_c33411 _d33411 |
||